Photos lack context
Images stay on phones or in conversations without a clear link to an area, work package or action.
GE2Smart builds focused site-tracking tools to centralise photos, snags, documents, decisions and responsibilities without imposing an oversized platform.
A site tool must remain quick to use while linking each item to a work package, area, owner, deadline and history.
Images stay on phones or in conversations without a clear link to an area, work package or action.
Spreadsheets and messages do not always give a reliable view of what remains open.
Drawings, reports, technical sheets and versions circulate across several spaces.
Progress, blockers and workload are consolidated late for each project.
The scope can focus on snags and photos or include wider operational tracking according to the company’s needs.
Customer, address, contributors, work packages, milestones, documents and useful contacts.
Link area, date, comment, author and status to each piece of field evidence.
Owner, priority, deadline, reminder, corrective evidence and approval.
Drawings, technical sheets, reports and documents available according to permissions.
Requests, assignments, updates and evidence linked to their scope.
Progress, blockers, overdue actions and decisions needing attention.
The site manager takes photos, messages subcontractors and updates a spreadsheet before meetings. Statuses quickly diverge.
The application creates the snag on site, links it to the area and work package, assigns an owner, follows the deadline and requests evidence of the correction.
Meetings start from a reliable list, each contributor sees their scope and closure remains documented with before-and-after photos.
Each example starts from an existing way of working, describes a possible tool and states the outcome to aim for.
Progress, observations, photos, tasks, lots and decisions captured close to the work.
Discuss a similar casePhotos, location, lot, owner, deadline, correction evidence and closure decision.
Discuss a similar casePlans, reports, approvals and latest useful versions linked to the project and its responsibilities.
Discuss a similar caseProgress, blockers, late actions and decisions across active projects.
View the related solutionThe prototype reduces risk. Framing data, access rights and exceptions protects the move into production.
Design the journey with the people who actually enter information in the field.
Require only what is needed for searching, tracking and evidence.
Validate button sizes, camera use, connectivity and data-entry time in real conditions.
Employees, subcontractors and customers receive different views according to their needs.
01Photos linked to a specific action
02Visible snags and deadlines
03Less consolidation before meetings
04Retrievable evidence of closure
The answers stay general. Your data, risks and constraints determine the final scope.
Yes, with access restricted to their work packages, actions or documents.
Yes, with association to the project, area and relevant action.
Yes, within a focused scope. Advanced document-management features are assessed according to volumes and requirements.
Yes, with indicators and action lists suited to management, site managers and account managers.
Describe the process and mention any files or screenshots you could share during a later, secure exchange.
A question about your need, a solution or pricing? Answers use the public pages of this site and show their sources.